First read the Duluth News Tribune article and see my proof (Following) concerning this ALLEGED REGULATORY AGENCY IN CHARGE OF OUR NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION(?) THAT HAS SPRAYED CHEMICALS RIGHT A TOP MY HOME AND PRIVATE PROPERTY, CREATIVELY DESIGNING THESE CHEMTRAILS IN SATANIC, ILLUMINATI, SYMBOLISM TO CORRELATE WITH IT’S DEMOCRATIC COMRADES NAZI AGENDA!
NOT TO MENTION WHAT DAYTON IS PROPOSING WILL EFFECT 3/4 OF THE CABINS AND HOMES ON THE LAKE I LIVE ON.
Gov. Dayton to propose buffer zones bordering all state waters
BROOKLYN PARK, Minn. — Gov. Mark Dayton announced Friday that he will propose legislation calling for vegetative buffer zones 50 to 60 feet wide bordering all waters of the state, with the regulation to be enforced by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Dayton made the announcement to about 325 people attending the 25th annual Roundtable meeting sponsored by the DNR in Brooklyn Park, Minn. The proposal grew out of a statewide Pheasant Summit called by the governor and held Dec. 13 in Marshall, Minn.
“I believe people should be good stewards of the land,” Dayton said. “They own the land, but the people own the waters.”
Minnesota’s pheasant numbers have declined significantly in recent years as farmers opt out of the federal Conservation Reserve Program, which pays landowners to take land out of crop production and to plant grasses. Pheasants need grasslands for nesting and for cover.
But Dayton emphasized that his proposal would improve the state’s water quality and benefit all species that rely on grassland habitat.
Duluth’s Frank Jewell, a St. Louis County commissioner and also a member of the Clean Water Council under the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment, welcomed Dayton’s proposal.
“This is so exciting,” Jewell said. “The issue of riparian buffers is huge.”
Current law requires buffers on many waters, but enforcement usually falls to individual counties and has been inconsistent, conservationists say.
“It’s been a soft policy, and it’s been viewed as a soft policy,” said Howard Vincent, president and CEO of Pheasants Forever.
Vincent supports the governor’s proposal.
“There’s not a better practice than buffers for wildlife, water and soil,” Vincent said, “but it’s still a starting point.”
Doug Busselman, director of public policy for the Minnesota Farm Bureau, said the governor’s proposal would be a hardship for many of the group’s 30,000 members.
“In many cases where there are buffer requirements, now it’s 16½ feet and now you’d be going to 50 and that’s going to take considerable land out of production,” said Busselman, who attended the governor’s speech at the Roundtable.
From 2007 to 2013, Minnesota lost 600,000 acres of grassland that had been enrolled in CRP, DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr said.
The buffer proposal would protect about 125,000 acres of land, or just under 200 square miles, along rivers, lakes and wetlands, the governor said.
A key provision of the proposal is that the DNR, not local or county officials, would enforce the buffer requirements, Dayton said.
“It will be enforced — and I mean enforced — by the DNR through aerial and other inspections,” the governor said.
Jewell said he has made tours in farm country where he has seen land farmed right up to waterways, with water running from farmland directly into the water.
“There should be fines for not complying (with the regulations),” Dayton said. “We have to have real consequences.”
The Farm Bureau’s Busselman said the proposal assumes there are widespread violations of current buffering requirements on farmland when in fact no statewide investigation has been conducted.
“We’d be enacting a broad regulation without any real sense of whether it’s going to do anything good for pheasant populations,” he said. “We have concerns over the one-size-fits-all nature of the governor’s particular proposal …. and we’ll obviously be engaged in the proposal as it goes through the legislative process. …
“There’s also a property rights issue that seems to be missed in all of this,” Busselman said “It’s somewhat akin to the governor saying, ‘Let’s take the front 20 feet of your lawn and let anyone walk on it.’ ”
If Dayton’s proposed legislation is adopted, the benefits of such a regulation would go far beyond creating more pheasant habitat, said Pheasants Forever’s Vincent.
“Whether you hunt or are an outdoors person or not, everyone should understand water and what we need to do to protect it,” Vincent said.
Dayton said he will make the proposal part of the budget he will propose to the Minnesota Legislature later this month.
This activity may have commenced outside the parameters of my property line(s), however the emissions wafted over my PRIVATE PROPERTY WHICH I OWN THE AIRSPACE OVER. These emissions fall to the surface soil, WHICH I OWN! This is “wanton disregard for human life” (AS DEFINED) Incriminal law, criminal negligence is one of the three general classes of mens rea (Latin for “guilty mind”) element required to constitute aconventional as opposed to strict liability offense. It is defined as an act that is:
- careless, inattentive, neglectful, willfully blind, or in the case of gross negligence what would have been reckless in any other defendant.
Today’s activity is also a threat to be secure in my person, house, papers, and effects a 4th AMENDMENT RIGHT! At 2:02 PM a helicopter then passed east of my place traveling the SW shoreline of the lake I live on. I took two photo’s but could only find it in the one marked below with the red circle.
In this photo into the clearing is the South side of the lake. You can actually see the dispersed chemtrail falling to the snow cover on the frozen lake. The sun is setting behind my home and the other photo is directly over the middle of the lake. You can see the chemical falling to the lake.
Then again around a lil after 4PM CT a trail of emissions directly over my home. This was dispersed over MY PRIVATE PROPERTY! OWNED STRAIGHT UP WITH NO LIENS, PROPERTY TAXES PAID AND CURRENT! This is becoming a problem, WITH SEVERAL PREDICATE ACTS TO CONFIRM AND ESTABLISH A PATTERN OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY!
Real property is land and ordinarily anything erected on, growing on, or affixed to it, including buildings and crops. Theterm is also used to declareany rights that issue from the ownership of land. The terms real estate and real propertygenerally refer to land. The term land, in its general usage,includes not only the face of the earth but everything of apermanent nature over or under it, including minerals, oil, and gases. In modern usage,the word premises has come to mean the land itself or the land with all structures attached. Residential buildings and yards are commonly referredto as premises.
…AND AGAIN A LIL AFTER 5PM THE NOISE (ORGANIZED STALKING NOISE CAMPAIGN) COMMENCING AT 2 PM AND STILL GOING ON) ALERTED ME TO ANOTHER PLANE! THIS IS A FIRST FOR THIS AMOUNT OF AIRCRAFT IN ONE DAY FLING OVER MY PRIVATE PROPERTY! ALL AIRCRAFT PHOTO’S ARE TIME AND DATE STAMPED AND LOGGED AS FILE NUMBERS IN THE HARD DRIVE OF MY PHONE, MY PHONE PHOTO’S AND MY PC HARD DRIVE! TO PROVE THE ONSLAUGHT OF ACTIVITY, IN THE SKIES ABOVE MY HOME AND PRIVATE PROPERTY, JUST TODAY!
I took photo’s of the plane’s blinking lights at 5PM (above) this early evening. None showed up. Flight plans will confirm that another plane flew over my place this late afternoon. The light shown is the moon from behind clouds (OR CHEMTRAILS!) and trees.
THIS IS ALL ONE AFTERNOON AND EVENING WHICH MY CELL PHONE PHOTO’S DATE AND TIME LOG AS FILE NUMBERS PER EA. PHOTO! I SPENT MOST OF THE 1ST 23 YEARS OF MY LIFE IN THE EXACT PLACE I AM NOW, AND CAN TELL YOU, WITHOUT A DOUBT THE SMALLER PLANE IN THE PHOTO’S IS THE DNR PLANE (STYLE) USED TO SPRAY INSECTICIDES AND GROWTH PROHIBITORY AGENTS OVER THE LAKE COUNTRY POWER POWER LINES!
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space’ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)–
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as–
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
Read Bill as written in House 2001~
H.R.2977 — Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in House – IH)
HR 2977 IH
107th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 2977To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESOctober 2, 2001Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILLTo preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
- This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001′.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
- Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.’.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
- The President shall–
- (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and
- (2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
- The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
- The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on–
- (1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and
- (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
- Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for–
- (1) space exploration;
- (2) space research and development;
- (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
- (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
- In this Act:
- (1) The term `space’ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
- (2)(A) The terms `weapon’ and `weapons system’ mean a device capable of any of the following:
- (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by–
- (I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
- (II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
- (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
- (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
- (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)–
- (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
- (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
- (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
- (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as–
- (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
- (ii) chemtrails;
- (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
- (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
- (v) laser weapons systems;
- (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
- (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
- (C) The term `exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display
ACTS OF TERRORISM; WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION; LETHAL AGENTS; TOXINS; HOAX SUBSTANCES
NRS 202.441 Definitions.
NRS 202.4415 “Act of terrorism” defined.
NRS 202.442 “Biological agent” defined.
NRS 202.4425 “Chemical agent” defined.
NRS 202.443 “Delivery system” defined.
NRS 202.4431 “For use as a weapon” defined.
NRS 202.4432 “Hoax substance” defined.
NRS 202.4433 “Material support” defined.
NRS 202.4435 “Oral, written or electronic communication” defined.
NRS 202.4437 “Radioactive agent” defined.
NRS 202.4439 “Terrorist” defined.
NRS 202.444 “Toxin” defined.
NRS 202.4445 “Weapon of mass destruction” defined.
NRS 202.445 Acts of terrorism or attempted acts of terrorism prohibited; penalties.
NRS 202.446 Certain acts related to weapons of mass destruction, lethal agents, toxins and delivery systems prohibited; penalties.
NRS 202.448 Making threats or conveying false information concerning acts of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, lethal agents or toxins prohibited; penalty.
NRS 202.449 Dispersing hoax substance prohibited; penalties.
SATURDAY NOV. 1ST. 2014, TAXPAYERS PAID TIME AND A HALF FOR THIS TERROR CAMPAIGN INVOLVING SATANIC/ILLUMINATI SYMBOLISM. I AM A DEVOUT CHRISTIAN, (NOT OF ANY DENOMINATION RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION, BUT THE TRUE CHURCH OF YASHUA, SON OF YAHAVAY! ALSO SOMETHING THE DEMOCRATS (Minnesota DFL) HATE!
I’m not sure what to make of yesterdays events. I was scoped out by a low flying airplane twice yesterday. It circled around noon and again a little after 1:00 pm. Similar to what the Minnesota DNR uses in St Louis County to spray herbicides and pesticides.
Again last evening between 5:30 and 5:45 pm (Aprox) the low flyer (I heard it) not too enthused as this was the 3rd time in one day, I didn’t rush to photograph the harassment, as I deemed it was a noise campaign embarked upon and was done giving the organized gang stalkers the satisfaction of annoying me, lol). Shortly thereafter I heard a jet flying lower than usual and this time I did go out to see what type of jet if possible. That’s when I took these photo’s first of the “V” shape left by dispersing something from the 1st plane. Which sounded the same as the plane here around noon and 1:00. That plane appeared to be similar if not the plane Minnesota DNR/St Louis County, uses to spray the power line to hinder tree growth/or a water bomber type plane used to fight brush-fires.
The below photo file numbers state they were taken at 5:44 last evening. Notice the symbol these planes had (or were in the process) of creating.
“Signs & Lying Wonders”: Satan’s V for Victory
The top of the Illuminati Trident (The all seeing eye of lucifer)?
I haven’t much experience with chemtrails and have just recently made the connection concerning the extreme targeting and persecution I’ve been inundated with for years, escalating to murdering family members, to be of the world and End Time Bible Prophecy. I believe the events yesterday to be both symbolic and of the chemical nature as I watched the farthest line of this sky writing(?) remained intact and was visibly falling while the closest line dissipated into the air. As I said, up until now I have had no reason to research chemtrails and or occult (Illuminati) symbolism (The Trident). I am a VERY spiritual Christian as was my youngest daughter, Sarah, who they took control of 1st by physically kidnapping her in December 2010 and through coercion since freeing her in January 2011. I lost my baby to this evil last month, September 30, 2014 she was murdered. Her story is on this blog, posted last month.
Any feedback from Targeted Individuals, those having knowledge of chemtrails, symbolism in the occult (Illuminati) etc. etc. is appreciated. Could this just be a coincidence? NO! EVERYTHING HAS MEANING TO A PERSECUTED CHRISTIAN IN THESE END OF DAYS!
Ephesians 6:12King James Version (KJV)
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
The V-Sign is the Sign of the occult, satanic Sabbatean/Frankists
IT BEGAN IN GERMANY
THE NEW WORLD ORDER
A significant source of my targeting is carried out or facilitated by the Democrats (Minnesota DFL) specifics posted on this blog.
This was the following day, November 6th. The #MNDNR (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources circled my home (PRIVATE PROPERTY) in excess of 5 times. They eventually started circling past the treeline to avoid my taking photo’s so I audio taped the noise campaign they were on! I posted this to Facebook as well as sent EMAIL WARNINGS TO SEVERAL THAT I WAS AUDIO TAPING THE COVERT CREEP CIRCLING MY PRIVATE PROPERTY AND IT STOPPED!
These ILLEGAL missions are now carried out after dark, with the exception of yesterday ((Jan. 16th. 2015) following an incident of targeting, by a troll on Facebook, dropping Freemason/Satanic Symbols, airtraffick was non stop. Because this ORGANISED GANG STALKING PROGRAM INCLUDES SLEEP DEPRIVATION (THE NIGHT BEFORE) I DID NOT OBLIGE AS THEY HOPED TO GO OUTSIDE TO VEIW OR PHOTOGRAPH THEIR SHOW. THAT INCIDENT IS POSTED ON MY FACEBOOK BLOG My Story of Gang Stalking, Corruption and Domestic Terrorism AND ORGANIZED STALKER PERP ALERT, Ellen Larrouy droppin’ Satanic, Illuminati symbols. Identify paid trolls, gang-stalkers and counterintelligence agents.
IT SEEMS IMPORTANT TO THIS ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE THAT I KNOW IT’S AFFILIATION WITH THE synagogue of satan! …my comment is, GET BEHIND ME satan! …and US Rep Rick Nolan, THIS NOW FALLS ON YOU (no pun intended) ACCOUNTABLE TO ADDRESS MY CONCERNS YOU ACKNOWLEDGED IN WRITING AS VALID!
LAKES AND WATERWAYS AFFECTED BY THIS DNR/DFL DOMESTIC TERRORISM PARTNERSHIP AND CRIMINAL COLLUSION ARE : Harriet Lake, ,Helen Lake, Tank Lake, Janet Lake, Island Lake, Beauty Lake, Happy Lake, Twin Lake, West Swan River, etc. etc. all of which have smaller creeks and underground water veins which drain into the Great Lakes, Lake Superior being one. THOSE IN BOLD ARE WITHIN 5-10 MILES OF THE CHEMTRAILS PICTURED. JANET LAKE BEING RIGHT BENEATH AND ACROSS THE HIGHWAY ISLAND LAKE! This IS being carried out by the SAME Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: Minnesota DNR THAT DAYTON HAS ASSIGNED TO REGULATE OUR LAKES PRIVATELY OWNED LAKE SHORES? THE VERY MINNESOTA AGENCY POISONING THE AIR WE BREATH AND LAKE(S) WE FISH AND SWIM IN, WITH THEIR CHEMTRAILS!
MY OPINION IS THIS IN LIGHT OF THE EVER INCREASING ACTIVISM BY MANY AGAINST CHEMTRAILS IS SHEDDING LIGHT ON WHO THE CULPRITS REALLY ARE AND THIS IS YET ANOTHER OF DAYTONS MANIPULATIVE ATTEMPTS TO RATIONALIZE AND HAVE SOMEONE TO BLAME FOR THE POISONING OUR AIR AND WATERWAYS UNDER THE GUISE OF FICTITIOUSLY REGULATING SOMETHING THAT HAS NO PROOF EXISTS IN THE FIRST PLACE! MORE TAXPAYER MONEY WASTED! AND THAT SATURDAY SATANIC SKYWRITING EPISODE TO HARASS on a Saturday on your MINNESOTA TAXPAYER BUCK! TIME AND A HALF TO WRITE SATANIC SYMBOLS ABOVE MY HOME! Thank the Minnesota DFL Party WHO AUTHORIZED IT!
INDISPUTABLE PROOF THAT THE MINNESOTA DFL PARTY NOT ONLY SPONSORS THIS ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE IT IS EXTENSIVELY A PARTY TO IT!